Sunday, June 21, 2015

Language Development for 4 to 5 year olds - Communication (Part 5)

This post will continue the discussion of the component - Expressive Language and the learning expectation:  Uses conventions of speech while expressing ideas.  Remember I am taking my information from the Tennessee Early Learning Developmental Standards (TN-ELDS).

We will start with the performance indicator:  Understands "yesterday," "today," and "tomorrow."  Like so many other performance indicators in the language development section, this one very much depends on the child's language exposure.  Those children that have language delays will have trouble with this one.  Those that do not will conquer it easily.  These concepts are picked up in conversations with adults.  For the adults, this will mean that they will have to constantly correct the child's wrong notions of time over and over and over when they are 3 years old.  Many adults do not bother with this very critical step.  Therefore, many children will not conquer this one until they are 5 or 6 years old.

The next performance indicator is:  May use slang (e.g., "Give me five," "Cool!").  Unlike proper language, slang tends to be the one thing most children pick up quite quickly.  I had one little boy that was three years old.  He called the police "Po Po," which we all found quite amusing.  However, this little boy really thought that is what the police were called.  Obviously, every adult around him called the police that, and so he thought that is what they were called.  Adults sometimes forget how powerful their influence can be on the children around them.  Many, many a cuss word has come out of small children's mouths because the adults in their life do not filter their language around the children.  Children pick up slang without effort.  Please, remember that.

That brings us to the next performance indicator:  Generally uses sentences with correct grammar.  This one depends so greatly on a child's language experiences that it should shame adults into using better grammar around their children.  Children that have educated parents and have been read to regularly conquer this one easily.  Children with uneducated parents that never or rarely read to them, use the same level of grammar correctness of the people in their lives.  Children with uneducated parents that try to read to them regularly but still use horrible grammar in their everyday speech will still have children that struggle with this performance indicator.  Remember, I told you in the previous paragraph that children pick up slang without effort.  Picking up correct grammar usage takes time and practice.  It is like everything else in life.  The bad comes easy.  The good comes with hard work and effort.

The next performance indicator is:  Pronounces new words easily.  This one hits on the growing issue of speech problems I have touched on in other posts.  I am seeing more and more speech problems with 3 and 4 year olds than I have seen before.  Children are having more and varied problems with consonant and blend sounds.  I have called this phenomenon "lazy tongue" because most of the problems have to do with tongue placement and usage to create the sounds.  I still have not pinpointed what is causing this problem.  It may be a conglomeration of many different trends coming together to create this particular issue.  Whatever the cause, I am having to work much harder at teaching phonemic awareness and letter sounds these days.  For many of the sounds I am having to break it down to its mechanics and teach the children where to place the tongue and lips to make each sound.  What amazes me is how hard it is for many of the children to do.  The tongue muscle is so underdeveloped that is takes days and sometimes weeks of trying to get the sounds correct.  I have never seen anything like it.

The last performance indicator for this post is:  Has expanding vocabulary (keep in mind that a child knows more words than he says).  This holds true for most 4 year olds.  However, the amount of vocabulary from one four year old to another four year old can vary astronomically.  Some 4 year olds have vocabulary of 1000 words or more.  Some 4 year olds have barely 100 words.  Language delays play heavily into the level of vocabulary a child has.  This one is also heavily affected by how much the child has had an adult read to them.  This diversity of ability makes the jobs of preschool and Headstart teachers difficult.  Trying to catch the children at the bottom end of the skill level up with those at the top level proves impossible in just one year of preschool.  Therefore, this problem spills over into kindergarten and beyond.  Truthfully, those children at the bottom never catch those at the top.  Many of those children at the bottom of the skill level need two years of preschool before kindergarten not just one.  I fear politics will never allow these children to receive the additional instruction they need because many would construe the practice as racist since minority children tend to be the majority of children at the bottom of the skill level.  That is unfortunate for these children.

I hope you have enjoyed this post.  Goodbye and God bless!! https://linktr.ee/natawade

Saturday, June 13, 2015

Relativism and the Concept of Choices

This post will look in more depth at the concept of choices in early childhood theory.  We will start with the concept of right and wrong versus social norms.  We will then move on to how social norms play out in society at large.  Finally we will look at the importance of obedience.

Right and Wrong vs. Social Norms
Whether you realize it or not, our society has moved from the concept of right and wrong toward social norms.  Instead of everything being cut and dry or black and white, everything has now become different shades of grey.  The lighter the grey the more "accepted" it is.  The darker the grey the more "misunderstood" it is.  The liberal population of this country want to take us away from set principles of right and wrong.  Why has this happened?  To be brutally honest, liberals do not want to answer to an all-powerful God and His ideas of right and wrong.  They want to do what is right in their own eyes.  What is wrong with that?  A hundred years ago most everyone could answer that question without using too much brain power.  However, since our society has gone down this path for several decades many people do not see the harm in that statement.  What is wrong with everyone doing what is right in their own eyes?  That brings me back to the Boston Marathon Bomber.  In his eyes killing infidels (Americans) was right.  However, what he did was not right in the eyes of anyone in Boston.  This brings us to social norms.  It is the liberal's answer to the conundrum of situations like the Boston Marathon Bomber.  However, the social norms do not necessarily follow the old traditional path of right and wrong.  Many, many behaviors and lifestyles that were once considered wrong have gained prominence in the idea of social norms.  AND if you dare to follow the old ideas of right and wrong and cross their social norms, you are the evil one not the other way around.  For those of us that still hold to the traditional view of right and wrong, it feels like our culture is upside down and backwards.  One of my favorite quotes that I see quite often on Facebook is this:  "Just because a majority says that something is right does not make it right."  A student of history would know this.  Need an example?  The Nazis of Germany were followed by the majority at least in the beginning.  As time went on, the people of Germany began to see the error of their way.  Maybe just maybe Americans will begin to open their eyes and understand the peril of the path they have chosen.

Social Norms and Political Correctness

Moving toward social norms also moves us toward choices over obedience.  In the social norms' mindset everything is a matter of choice.  Removing right and wrong makes the concept of obedience obsolete.  However, has anyone ever stopped to consider the logical conclusion to the path our society has chosen?  When you remove absolutes, everything from laws to customs becomes subject to the whims of the popular mindset of the day.  We already have this to some degree.  It is called political correctness, and more and more it becomes the law of the land.  Many people may not see the harm in political correctness, but as many people are sick to death of constantly doing and saying the wrong thing innocently because they have not gotten the memo on the latest correct thing to do and say.  It has now become politically incorrect to say "you guys."  I say that all the time.  Where does it end?  Where do we reach the point where we achieve absolute political correctness?  We will never reach the end because there will always be someone that wants to push it in a different direction.  Do we really want a society where everything is subject to the whims of the political correctness police?  It has already reached the point of ridiculous.  Personally, I am ready to send the political correctness police packing.  Without absolutes a society drifts from one crazy notion to the next crazy notion.  A society needs stability.  Whether you like them or not, a society needs absolutes.

The Importance of Obedience
Now let us take this into the early childhood realm.  Most of us in the early childhood world understand that children need structure.  However, when you move that structure over into the realm of boundaries many liberals cry "foul."  Can you have one without the other?  Can you provide structure for children and give them complete choice?  The answer to that question is a big NO.  I am sorry, but you cannot have it both ways.  If you want to have structure for children, boundaries must be in place.  To enforce boundaries, obedience is necessary.  Children will not choose of their own accord to be restricted.  It goes against their fallen nature.  The concept of choices in the early childhood world equates the concept of social norms and political correctness in the adult world.  It represents the removal of absolutes from the picture.  I am sorry if this upsets many in the early childhood realm, but the fact remains.  You cannot remove absolutes without creating chaos.  I have seen so many early childhood professionals following the theory of giving children choices thinking they were doing the most wonderful job in the world.  Usually, I leave those classrooms with my teeth chattering because it was utter and complete chaos.  I have been in other classrooms where boundaries were the norm.  Not only were the children well-behaved, but they were also light years ahead of the other classrooms academically.  Children thrive with boundaries in place.  They do not thrive in utter and complete chaos.  The evidence should be overwhelming, but some people are so dead set on removing absolutes that they do not allow themselves to see the true consequences.

I hope you have enjoyed this post.  Goodbye and God bless!! https://linktr.ee/natawade