The Early Childhood Community and Diversity of Thought

This post will look at the role of diversity of thought in diminishing the effects of groupthink on our early childhood field.

What Do I Mean By Diversity of Thought
This has to be one of the most important concepts of our time.  For years we have had diversity shoved down our throats, but that diversity did not include diversity of thought.  Diversity of thought happens when a group can entertain widely differing views without feeling the need to shut down the free speech of one group or the other.  In other words, everyone is entitled to their opinion and no one is allowed to harm you physically or emotionally because of that opinion.  This is the essence of the first amendment.  However, we see everywhere in this country one group shouting down, harassing, or physically abusing people with a differing viewpoint. College campuses are the worst.  So much violence has broken out because they have ceased to be places where diversity of thought is celebrated.  Many people feel "triggered" because someone dares to have a viewpoint that differs from their own.  Someone's viewpoint should never force you into a "safe space" and if it does, you live in a bubble.  We as a society have ceased to debate issues.  Now we scream at each other and bully our opponents into silence.  So many of our institutions and fields of study have become poster children for groupthink.  We have a serious problem on our hands.

The Difference between Diversity and Diversity of Thought
With all the talk of diversity these days, many might be confused by all the talk of the lack of diversity of thought.  Let me try to explain the difference to you.  Diversity as it has come to be defined by the political correctness movement involves the acceptance of many points of view that have previously been held in disdain.  For example, the latest push for diversity comes for transgenderism.  It also encompasses multiculturalism, where all the cultures of the world should be celebrated.  In theory, these ideals seem good to discourage discrimination.  However, once you begin to pull back the layers of the onion, you will begin to notice that only one viewpoint holds supremacy - the progressive secular humanistic viewpoint.  Even the multiculturalism that is pushed involves only the aspects of those cultures that fit the progressive secular humanistic viewpoint.  All other worldviews especially the Christian worldview are held in disdain.  Basically, diversity has come to mean that all the worldviews that once held the progressive secular humanistic worldview in disdain are now fair targets for discrimination, but you do not dare discriminate against the progressive secular humanistic worldview.  To do so will bring the complete and unfiltered wrath of the progressive left.  This is not diversity.  This is a tyrannical movement that means to squash all other worldviews into oblivion.  Diversity of thought means actually accepting differing points of view without hostility.  It does not mean you have to agree with those points of view.  It does mean you have to respect the other person's right to hold that opinion.  Only in that circumstance can we have civil discourse.  What we have today is vitriol.

The College Conundrum
Nowhere in our country is this problem more prevalent than on college campuses.  Almost all of the departments especially all the ones dealing with the humanities and culture have been taken over by secular progressive liberals.  The ratio on most college campuses for college professors is 20 liberals to one conservative.  In some places it is much higher.  That one lone conservative does not dare voice his/her true opinions for fear of losing his/her job.  Free speech does not exist on college campuses anymore.  This lack of diversity of thought has created entire fields of study including the early childhood field that has started down the rabbit hole into irrelevance.  Training in these fields does not truly build up the field.  It is simply a means to indoctrinate those that do not have the same level of education.  Anyone wanting to advance in any of these fields better wholeheartedly embrace the progressive secular humanistic worldview or face blacklisting on a scale not seen since the days of McCarthy.  What happened?  Colleges used to be bastions of free speech and exposure to differing points of view.  That only held when conservatives were in the majority.  We have been under a slow revolution since the 1960s where progressive thought has taken over our colleges and as it has, it has sought to silence all other viewpoints through intimidation.  People, that is the very definition of fascism.

How to Push for Diversity of Thought
Number one, I implore/plead/beg that those in power in the national early childhood organizations will see the peril of our situation and begin to seek out people with moderate or conservative points of view to serve.  As it stands now, they will not give even moderates the time of day.  I am not talking about having a "token" conservative that still fears opening his/her mouth.  I am talking about having someone like me that speaks her mind despite the consequences.  We need people to be bold on this matter.  No change has ever come with timidity.  Number two, colleges and training organizations need to seek out moderates and conservatives to teach and train.  This area probably has the most ground to cover.  I would dare say that if you have conservatives functioning in this capacity, they have completely compartmentalized their personal beliefs.  All training that I have ever encountered has had a very, VERY liberal bias unless I was doing it.  I have also been blacklisted in many circles and not allowed to present unless I tailor my workshops to at least appear somewhat liberal.  I have had many places where I have not been invited back because my points despite being valid and very well-researched have offended someone.  Number three, the rank and file childcare workers need to demand better training and understand that they are being indoctrinated.  Some do understand this but are afraid to say anything.  People have had witch hunts launched against them for less.  However, as I said change never comes for the timid.
Conclusion
If nothing else, pray that the liberal elites will lose their stranglehold on power in our field.  Events over the last six months have given me hope that a silent majority can rise up and throw off the shackles of the progressive left.  O Lord God, please let that continue!!!!!

I hope you have enjoyed this post.  Goodbye and God bless!! https://linktr.ee/natawade

 

Cognitive Development for 4 to 5 year olds - Math (Part 1)

This post will begin the discussion of the area of learning - Math starting with the component - Number and Operations.  Remember I am taking my information from the Tennessee Early Learning Developmental Standards (TN-ELDS).

The first learning expectation is:  Begins to identify and label objects using numbers.  The performance indicator for this one is:  Develops increased abilities to combine, separate and name "how many" concrete objects.  Some children will conquer this one easily and some will struggle horribly.  The biggest factor usually involves whether or not the child has been exposed to number concepts during his/her toddler years.  Adults in previous times used to talk to small children about "how many" during many everyday conversations.  Now, that just is not the case.  Unless the child has been exposed to number concepts in a childcare setting or had parents/caregivers that purposefully exposed him/her to these concepts, four year old children will struggle with number concepts above two or three objects.

The second learning expectation is:  Develops understanding of numbers and their association with objects.  The first performance indicator for this one is:  Begins to associate number concepts, vocabulary, quantities, and numerals in meaningful ways.  This is the point where teaching style comes very much into play.  Teachers that rely on exposure and exploration will not be able to have the same results as teachers that handle number concepts with direct instruction.  Number concepts for the most part are a left brain function, and left brain function concepts need direct instruction.  Students that have teachers that work with them one-on-one using direct instruction have an even greater result than direct instruction in a group setting.  I have seen this first hand.  Many "experts" have been blown away by how much I accomplish with direct instruction especially with children with delays and immaturity issues.  Small children need one-on-one instruction more than older children and older children benefit from that method as well.  Maybe someday this revelation will move outside of the homeschooling movement and into the mainstream.

The second performance indicator is:  Develops increasing ability to count in sequence to 10 and beyond.  Truthfully, I expect my 3 year olds to count to 10.  I expect my 4 year olds to count much higher than that.  By the time they are 5 years old, I expect them to be able to count to 100 or pretty close to it.  Of course, I work them in this department.  I make them count almost daily if not daily and most normally developing children conquer this one with that kind of practice.  This is a skill and requires daily practice.  Please, do not let a skill like this rely on exposure and discovery to develop.  That is ludicrous.  Practice makes perfect!!

Now we move on to the component - Patterns and Algebra.  The first learning expectation is:  Explores and begins to sort and classify objects.  The first performance indicator for this learning expectation is:  Shows understanding of and uses comparative words.  For those that have not worked in early childhood in the last five years, this one would seem to be easy to conquer.  However, I have had to directly teach so many four year olds these types of words because they walked through my door without any prior knowledge of these types of words.  We really need to have an intervention with some of these parents and help them understand how important it is to talk and read to their children.  The smartphone has greatly diminished family conversations in many households.  Children pick up these types of concepts from everyday conversation with adults, and if they do not, you, the teacher, will have to directly teach these concepts.

The last performance indicator for this learning expectation is:  Groups common related objects: shoe, sock, foot; apple, orange, plum.  This one comes easier to children that the previous one, but still depends on a child's prior knowledge base.  Some children conquer this one easily but those with language delays struggle.  Many people do not understand how much language delays affect every other area of learning.  So much in the early years depends on a child's working vocabulary.  When a child's vocabulary is limited, everything else suffers.  However, exposure to grouping activities helps with both categories.  Grouping improves as well as a child's working vocabulary.

I hope you have enjoyed this post.  Goodbye and God bless!! https://linktr.ee/natawade

 

The Early Childhood Community and Groupthink

This post will start a series on the present state of the early childhood field as a whole.  Specifically, it will focus on the problem of groupthink and how to fix it.  This particular post will lay out the case for our guilt as it pertains to groupthink.

What is Groupthink?
Wikipedia defines Groupthink as "a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome. Group members try to minimize conflict and reach a consensus decision without critical evaluation of alternative viewpoints by actively suppressing dissenting viewpoints, and by isolating themselves from outside influences."  A lot has been said in the media lately about various groups of people living in a "bubble."  That "bubble" mentality could also be considered groupthink.  When a group of people too closely share a worldview or viewpoint, groupthink becomes a danger.  This is especially true if this group vehemently opposes differing views.  In fact, that is the truest sign of groupthink.  Does the group tolerate differing views or do they try to squash differing views?

What is the Big Deal?
You may be wondering (especially if you are part of a bubble) why groupthink is such a big deal.  Groupthink has several negative consequences.  The first one is the demise of innovation.  When a group especially an entire field of study becomes guilty of groupthink, then the next generation of innovations suffers.  Whether you like to admit or not, the next wave of innovation usually comes from the opposing view of the majority.  Why is that?  It is because they are trying to fix the status quo.  Innovation always flows from that mindset.  If a field of study stifles or actively demonizes all opposing views, the field becomes stagnant and in danger of being replaced by an outside force of opposition.  The next danger of groupthink involves becoming blind to their own state of affairs.  When a group or field of study cannot be challenged, they become almost inbred.  They believe they are continuing to innovate when in reality they are only doing variations of the same theme.  How many times have you attended a workshop because the title intrigued you only to leave the workshop disappointed because it was the same old stuff wrapped up in a new package?  More times than I can count.  The last danger of groupthink comes about when they have been in that state for a considerable amount of time.  I call it "going down the rabbit hole."  They become so blind to their own state of affairs that they begin to do harm instead of good.  I also call this "being upside down and backwards."  In trying to innovate without outside or opposing forces to control the process, they truly become inbred and take off on dangerous tangents.  They take good ideas to horrible extremes and take what should be a great idea and mutate it into something detrimental to all involved.  The greatest example of this has to be political correctness.  The beginnings of political correctness probably had good intentions but the nature of the beast stifled opposition and became inbred.  Now we have an uncontrollable monster that makes most of us completely miserable.

Where are all the Conservatives?
At this point, many of you may be horrified and wondering if I mean to accuse the early childhood community and field of groupthink.  I do.  To prove my point I want to pose some questions.  Number one, where are all the conservatives?  I want you to consider this carefully.  How many true conservatives (not moderates) do you know in this field that have a bachelor's degree or higher?  Those with degrees embody the group in this field that make all the regulations and standards and/or provide all the training and technical assistance.  How many of those people are true conservatives?  Number two, how do those in power react when someone questions concepts like developmentally appropriate practice and "best practices?"  If you do not know the answer to that question, try it.  I have, and the result is venomous.  They will treat you like you are guilty of child abuse.  Number three, do the people in this field feel pressured to "tow the party line" in order to be employed in this field?  This one I know first hand.  I cannot get a teaching job in this field because of my conservative views.  They will never come out and say that, but they scrutinize my credentials much more than those with the same credentials and a liberal worldview.  I have been told more times than I want to acknowledge that my credentials do not fit the job just to have them hire someone with the exact same degree.  Lastly, are people with strong religious convictions forced to compartmentalize their faith in order to be taken seriously in this field?  This one I will cover in the next section.

Compartmentalization
What do I mean by compartmentalization?  If a person of faith has to put that faith in a box separate from their career, that should be the greatest indicator of a field enveloped in groupthink.  I know many Christians in this field, but they believe that their faith should only be a personal matter and should not bleed over into their work.  Why in the world should a person of faith feel the need to completely divorce their faith from their work?  That only happens when the field of work has been completely dominated by the secular progressive liberal worldview.  These people cannot apply their faith to their work because they would be ostracized or worse.  Unfortunately for me, I did not get the memo on compartmentalizing my faith.  Actually, I know the Bible too well to get away with that.  Our faith is our faith at work, play, and all other aspects of our life, and if our work forces us to lay that faith aside, something is seriously askew.

How to combat Groupthink
The only way to combat groupthink involves diversity of thought.  I will cover this in more detail in my next post on this series, but I will give the short version here.  We have got to get to the point as a society where we can handle an opposing view without requiring a safe space.  I have had to sit through more trainings and had to read more books that drove me nuts than I can count.  I had to learn to find the nuggets of truth in the most ridiculous arguments or lose my sanity.  Therein, lies the trick.  You have to listen to people to find those nuggets.  If we all learned to listen to one another and find those common ground nuggets of truth and apply them to the problems of this world, we might just get somewhere someday.

Conclusion
Many different fields of study and work have fallen prey to groupthink in our present society not just the early childhood field.  However, this is my field and I want to fight for its longterm viability.  I challenge early childhood professional groups and training colleges to hire more at least moderates if not conservatives.  Groupthink will make us irrelevant unless we begin to take steps to rectify it.

I hope you have enjoyed this post.  Goodbye and God bless!! https://linktr.ee/natawade

 

Cognitive Development for 4 to 5 year olds - Early Literacy (Part 7)

This post will finish up the discussion of the area of learning, Early Literacy, with the component, Letter Recognition.  Remember I am taking my information from the Tennessee Early Learning Developmental Standards (TN-ELDS).

The first learning expectation is:  Begins to recognize letters.  The first performance indicator is:  Recognizes letters of her own name (first and then last) and letters that frequently occur in environmental print.  The way a child develops letter recognition depends greatly on the underlying philosophy of the teacher.  A great deal of the children I have taught over the years learned the letters in their name as they learned their letters in general.  I have a purposeful and intentional approach to teaching the letters of the alphabet instead of an environmental exposure approach to the letters.  For the children in my care, the letters in their name may or may not be the first letters they learn.  Most of the children unless they have delays or immaturity issues start learning the letters when they are three or three and a half years of age.  By the time they are four to four and a half years old, they know most or all of their upper case letters.  Then we start on lower case.  Remember I have a homeschooling background and know how to properly utilize flashcards in a one-on-one situation.  Flashcards help this process immensely when you use them one-on-one.  The trick is to vary how you make the child respond.  Sometimes let them tell you the name as you hold up the card.  The next time say the name and make them find the letter among a group of letters.  Then the next time have them say the names as they put them in order.  Expose them to one letter at a time and constantly grow the pool of letters you drill.  This only takes a few minutes per day and produces results that honestly flabbergast the "flashcards are of the devil" crowd.  A little direct teaching in this particular department can go a very long way.

The next performance indicator is:  Recognizes letters in a specific context (mostly environmental print), but may not recognize them when the context changes.  Again, this performance indicator depends heavily on how the children are taught their letters.  If a teacher relies on environmental print exposure to teach the letters, this will be the result.  If a teacher directly teaches the letters in the manner I laid out in the previous paragraph, this will not be the result.  Children that have been taught their letters through direct instruction with varying types of exposure will know their letters in any context, period.

The next performance indicator for this learning expectation is:  Is more likely to confuse uppercase letters within each of the following groups - DCGOQ, BRPSJU, EF, and NMWAVYHLITKXZ - but may make distinctions between letters that belong to different groups.  There is a degree of truth to this performance indicator.  It has been my experience that children will have difficulty with one or two of the letters in each group not the entire group.  Of course, I direct teach the letters instead of trying to teach them through environmental exposure.  Again, the teaching method makes all the difference in the world.

The last performance indicator for this learning expectation is:  Knows part of the ABC sequence by rote, but does not use it to associate a letter symbol with a letter name.  Again, this depends on the style of the teacher.  If all you ever do is sing the Alphabet song, this will be the result.  If you sing the Alphabet song as you point to the letters, you will get a different result because you have combined auditory learning with visual learning.  This approach gives the children two different anchors for the knowledge, and that makes a huge difference in results.  My normally developing four year olds know the ABC sequence by rote and can point out the individual letters on the ABC chart on my wall because the auditory teaches them the sequence and the visual reinforces the letter instruction I do with them otherwise.

The last learning expectation for the component Letter Recognition is:  Begins to recognize frequently occurring uppercase and some of the most frequently occurring lowercase letters.  The first performance indicator is:  Can recognize some letters both in a familiar context (own name, environmental print) and in isolation.  I am beginning to feel like a broken record but these standards assume that teachers will teach letter recognition by using the exposure to environmental print method.  When letters are taught directly using the method I lay out in the previous section, the results will be far greater than this.  Most children will learn all or most of their uppercase letters and quite a few if not all or most of their lower case letters depending on how much exposure to the direct teaching they received at three years old.

The last performance indicator for this learning expectation is:  Recites ABCs; matches letter symbol with letter names by rote, but may have difficulty with letters that come later in the sequence (e.g., identifies KLMNOP as one letter); discriminates differences between upper and lower case letters.  Again, direct instruction with flashcards pushes 4 to 5 year old children far beyond this performance indicator.  A great deal of my children can match the lower case to the upper case not just discriminate the difference.  Also, when I recite the alphabet, I point to the letters as we sing the song and deliberately slow down for the LMNOP section to help them understand that those are individual letters and not one letter.  That has solved that problem almost entirely.

I hope you have enjoyed this post.  Goodbye and God bless!! https://linktr.ee/natawade

 

Building Resilience in Children - Positive Outlook

This post will conclude the discussion on building resilience in children.  A positive outlook will be the main theme of this one.

The Definition of a Positive Outlook
Webster defines the word, positive, as "expressed definitely; confident; certain."  Webster defines the word, outlook, as "a view; standpoint."  For the purposes of this post we will define positive outlook as "confident or optimistic point of view."  I like that Webster uses the word "confident and expressed definitely" because that denotes more than just a "happy-go-lucky" frame of mind.  I believe a positive outlook involves a choice and not a characteristic of your personality.  All personality types can make the choice on how they view their past, present, and future.  A person decides by an act of his/her will to let their past destroy them, their present cripple them, and their future terrify them or to learn from their past, enjoy the present, and look forward to the future.  It is a learned skill not something we are necessarily given at birth.

How to Build a Positive Outlook
Many people will say that a positive outlook is something given to you at birth.  It is genetic.  However, that does not represent the truth.  Many people do come into this world more predisposed for a positive outlook than others just like many people come into this world more predisposed to work math problems.  However, just like all people can learn to do basic math, all people can learn to look at life differently.  The trick boils down to self-talk.  How you inwardly talk to yourself during situations and circumstances greatly determines how you handle those situations and circumstances.  Do you talk yourself into failure before you ever begin or do you tell yourself that everything will work itself out?  Successful people have the ability to not overreact to situations and circumstances because they inwardly talk themselves through it.  It is like having a built-in life coach.  People that are not successful talk themselves out of success most of the time before they ever really give it any effort.  Somewhere down the line they have learned the wrong lesson of saving face by having extremely low expectations.  They do not count it as failure because it never really had the chance of success anyway.  We all know people like this.  They live a life of self-fulfilling prophecy of doom all the time.

How do we correct this?  For early childhood educators you can train a child to look at situations as challenges to be conquered, mistakes as opportunities for correcting course, and failures as valuable life lessons.  Young children develop their self talk from the way adults talk to them.  Do you encourage children to work through adversity?  Do you help them see the silver lining in humbling and humiliating circumstances?  Do you help them see their mistakes as learning how not to do something?  This is how you develop a positive outlook in children.

How to Sabotage a Positive Outlook
The largest way to sabotage a positive outlook in children is to model a negative outlook.  Those children in your care will learn 10 times more from what you do instead of what you say.  Therefore, adults, step number one involves cleaning your own house first.  Are you one of those people that lives the self-fulfilling prophecy of doom all the time?  Then you will NEVER be able to instill a positive outlook in the children.  Instead, you will teach the horrible vicious cycle of low expectations and saving face instead of high expectations and positive results.  Listen to yourself.  Do you constantly complain and spin everything in a negative light?  STOP!!!!  Teach yourself to look for the good in every situation.  Even horrible circumstances bring strength and character.  If you lived through it, you grew stronger.  When you learn to see the good, it changes how to talk to yourself.  That changes everything.

After you conquer your own negativity, now it is time to check how you talk to the children.  Believe it or not, you can destroy a positive outlook with seemingly innocent sayings.  Are you constantly telling the children that results do not matter?  Then you are setting them up for failure, low expectations, etc.  Results do matter.  You, the adult, must talk them through their difficulties not around them.  Instead of saying "That's okay.  It doesn't really matter."  You should say, "Keep trying, you might surprise yourself."  Do you put more emphasis on how they feel than what they achieve?  Learning about their feelings is only the first step in developing what many refer to as emotional intelligence, but it must go further.  Negative emotions must be harnessed and controlled.  The end goal must be to help children reach goals and achieve accomplishments.  Do not stop on step one.  Only talking about how they feel without following the whole process out to its logical conclusion, does not produce a child with a positive outlook.  Helping that child overcome negative emotions to become a productive member of society does produce a child with a positive outlook.

Conclusion
This series of posts have been about building resilience in children.  Most people never equate their resilience with the way they talk to themselves but it is highly important.  We must teach our children to see the good in all situations, to be people that learn from mistakes instead of being crippled by failure, and to strive toward accomplishments and goals rather than just existing.  We cannot survive as a society if our citizens do not have resilience.  Someone must rise up and be the adult in the room.  Let us be about raising a generation that can be those adults.

I hope you have enjoyed this post.  Goodbye and God bless!! https://linktr.ee/natawade

 

Cognitive Development for 4 to 5 year olds - Early Literacy (Part 6)

This post will cover the components Visual Discrimination, Visual Whole-Part-Whole Relationships, and Visual Sequencing (Patterning).  Remember I am taking my information from the Tenn.essee Early Learning Developmental Standards (TN-ELDS).

The first learning expectation is:  Discriminates likenesses and differences in black and white shapes, figures, and designs with subtle differences in detail or orientation.  The performance indicator for this one is:  Selects the figure(s) or design(s) that differ based on fine, internal difference or orientation.  Some four year olds conquer this one and some have great difficulty with this one.  Four year olds that have had practice with this concept as three year olds usually conquer this one easily.  Four year olds that have never been exposed to this concept will sometimes really struggle especially if he/she has a right brain dominance.  This is a left brain activity and left brain dominate children will have an easier time with this than right brain dominant children.  However, even children that have a left brain tendency but have never been exposed to paying attention to detail may still require direct instruction before understanding this concept.

The next learning expectation for the component Visual Discrimination is:  Discriminates likenesses and differences in symbols.  The performance indicator for this one is:  Correctly sorts letters and numerals and can find words that match; names a few letters and numerals.  Most four year olds can sort letters and numerals except for the really confusing ones like "b" "d" and "p" by the time they are five years old.  However, as a preschool teacher I believe it to be of much more importance whether or not they can name the letters and numerals rather than matching words that they may not even be able to read.  Remember, I am in the phonics camp not the whole language camp.  I believe being able to decode words is of much more importance than being able to recognize a word by sight.  We have a phonics based language.  It is crazy to me that we would try to teach our language by sight like one would learn Chinese (which is not phonics based) rather than decoding it.  Many school systems are now switching to a more phonics based approach to reading.  Therefore, we as preschool teachers should spend more time on learning the names and sounds of letters than on the "popcorn word" method of the past.  Believe me, by the time they are third graders, phonics learners can read circles around the their whole language counterparts.  Make sure these children visually discriminate and know the name of the letters and numbers.

The next component is:  Visual Whole-Part-Whole Relationships.  The learning expectation for this one is:  Further develops awareness of relationships of parts and wholes using more abstract figures.  The first performance indicator for this one is:  Completes puzzles of 8-20 pieces.  Five years ago more children conquered this particular indicator, but I have seen with every passing year a drop in the amount of four year olds that cannot even conquer a simple puzzle much less a more complex puzzle.  Puzzles take time and patience both of which is lacking severely in our present culture in adults not to mention children.  A great deal of the emotional situations we are experiencing in greater amounts contribute to the decline in some of these cognitive development milestones.  Ask any kindergarten teacher and he/she will tell you that it takes a good month or two to pull up the emotional maturity of the children coming through the doors before they can even begin to conquer academic concepts.  As a preschool teacher I had to spend 3/4 of my time on emotional development in order to be able to teach the basics of academic content.  I had to directly teach children to do puzzles and most of that involved learning to keep going even when it was hard.  It is not that the children do not necessarily have the cognitive ability to figure out puzzles.  They simply do not have the emotional maturity to stay after a task they find difficult.  Puzzles may bring hissy fits but a smart teacher understands that staying after this one kills two birds with one stone.

The second performance indicator for this component is:  Reproduces a 2-dimensional design with parts that vary by color and shape; constructs representations of objects from parts, with no model.  This one is not conquered by most kindergarteners much less four year olds.  Many, many children struggle horribly with abstract concepts especially when dealing with recreating without modeling.  I have found that children that are not exposed to academic content at three years old will not conquer abstract concepts until they are five or six years old.  A foundation must be laid for their brains to assimilate information in this way.  If they do not get the foundation at three, it must be laid at four.  If they do not get the foundation at four, it must be laid at five.  This is why many children arrive at kindergarten not ready for academic content.

The last component for this post is:  Visual Sequencing (Patterning).  The learning expectation is:  Uses left-to-right and top-to-bottom scanning; observes and reproduces a pattern with 3-dimensional objects by using a 2-dimensional paper model.  The performance indicator for this one is:  Reproduces simple color, size, and shape patterns from a paper model.  I have had four year olds that conquered this one but not many.  Many, many children today struggle with patterns.  I have found this to be one of those areas I have had to teach directly, and it usually takes the children 3-6 months to conquer the concept.  They must first be able to replicate a pattern using 3-dimensional objects before you can expect them to use a model to replicate a pattern.  I will start with connecting blocks and do simple 2 color patterns until they understand what makes a pattern.  Then I will move on to more elaborate patterns using 3-dimensional manipulatives.  Once I see that they fully understand the concept, then I will move on to paper models and 3-dimensional materials.

I hope you have enjoyed this post.  Goodbye and God bless!! https://linktr.ee/natawade

 

Building Resilience in Children - Courage

This post will continue the discussion on building resilience in children focusing this time on the element of courage.

The Definition of Courage
Webster defines courage as "the ability to conquer fear or anxiety."  I love that Webster uses the word "conquer" in this definition.  Courage is not the absence of fear or anxiety.  It is the ability to conquer our fears and anxieties.  This involves action on the part of the child not just a passive acceptance.  It is not enough to know about one's fears and anxieties.  We must actively work to conquer those fears and anxieties.

How to Build Courage
In our society we do a very good job of helping people to identify their fears.  However, identifying fears does not build courage.  It is only step one.  Once a fear has been identified, that fear must be actively faced on a consistent basis.  There are two very important words in the previous sentence - "actively" and "consistent."  Those are the next two steps in building courage in anyone.  People never conquer anything in a passive manner.  Change takes action.  For example, if a person has a fear of heights, in order to conquer that fear they must do actions that involve heights.  It does not have to be drastic and can even be incremental, but if they never face the fear, the fear remains.  Step three involves consistency.  Taking action only once does not accomplish much at all.  For example, I was involved in a car wreck about a year ago.  After that I was terrified of driving around big trucks.  ( I was rear-ended by a semi.)  I had to drive on the interstate around big trucks for 6 months before I could do so without anxiety.  The first couple of times required employing every stress-relieving tactic I knew.  It is not easy to drive when you are the verge of a panic attack, but if I had never gotten back out there, that situation could have crippled me emotionally for the rest of my life.  It also took much more than one time to accomplish conquering my fear.  Children need for us to show them how to conquer their fears not just make the situations go away.  We are crippling our children emotionally by not putting them in situations where their fears can be faced.  As I said, it does not have to be drastic and should be incremental with children, but it needs to be done.

How to Sabotage Courage
Is it possible to sabotage courage in our children?  One only has to look at the twenty-something population to see that it is VERY possible to sabotage courage in children.  The millenial generation is the first generation to almost fully be parented by helicopter parents and it shows immensely.  These now adults were sheltered from their fears and almost anything unpleasant, and they come completely unglued when they have to face anything unpleasant let alone scary.  Heard of "safe spaces" anyone?  Risk scares these adults to the point of needing medication.  This is ridiculous.  Unfortunately for these poor millenials they will have to face their fears eventually or be completely incapable of "adulting" anytime soon.  It is truly unfair what we have done to them.  Learning to overcome fears as an adult is 1000 times harder than learning to do it as a child.  Please, hear what I am saying.  STOP sheltering children from unpleasant experiences.  MAKE children work through their own difficulties.  BACK OFF helicopter parents before you completely ruin another entire generation.

Conclusion
These posts deal with resilience, which is the ability to bounce-back or adapt in a difficult situation.  Courage plays a pivotal role in resilience.  Early childhood people, please teach the next generation to face their fears not hide from them.  Teach them to take reasonable risks.  Help them understand that adversity requires a person to work through it not hide from it.  The real world will not provide "safe spaces" for these children when they grow up.  You are doing them the largest disservice in the world by providing this to them now.  Please, make building resilience a much higher priority than a lot of the other cultural and behavioral milestones we place so much emphasis on.

I hope you have enjoyed this post.  Goodbye and God bless!! https://linktr.ee/natawade